Interactive Storytelling with Social Robots to Support Multilingual Children | Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference (2024)

1. Tony Belpaeme, James Kennedy, Aditi Ramachandran, Brian Scassellati, and Fumihide Tanaka. 2018. Social robots for education: A review. Science Robotics 3, 21 (2018), eaat5954. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aat5954Google ScholarCross Ref
2. Huili Chen, HaeWon Park, and Cynthia Breazeal. 2020. Teaching and learning with children: Impact of reciprocal peer learning with a social robot on children’s learning and emotive engagement. Computers & Education 150 (2020), 103836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103836Google ScholarDigital Library
3. Josephine co*ck and Beat Meier. 2012. Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning. Springer, Chapter Task sequencing and learning, 3266–3269.Google Scholar
4. Daniela Conti, Alessandro DiNuovo, Carla Cirasa, and Santo DiNuovo. 2017. A Comparison of Kindergarten Storytelling by Human and Humanoid Robot with Different Social Behavior. In Proceedings of the Companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Vienna, Austria) (HRI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 97–98. https://doi.org/10.1145/3029798.3038359Google ScholarDigital Library
5. Mirjam de Haas, Paul Vogt, and Emiel Krahmer. 2020. The Effects of Feedback on Children’s Engagement and Learning Outcomes in Robot-Assisted Second Language Learning. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 7 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2020.00101Google ScholarCross Ref
6. Mirjam de Haas, Paul Vogt, Rianne van den Berghe, Paul Leseman, Ora Oudgenoeg-Paz, Bram Willemsen, Jan de Wit, and Emiel Krahmer. 2022. Engagement in longitudinal child-robot language learning interactions: Disentangling robot and task engagement. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 33 (2022), 100501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2022.100501Google ScholarDigital Library
7. Jan de Wit, Arold Brandse, Emiel Krahmer, and Paul Vogt. 2020. Varied Human-Like Gestures for Social Robots: Investigating the Effects on Children’s Engagement and Language Learning. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Cambridge, United Kingdom) (HRI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 359–367. https://doi.org/10.1145/3319502.3374815Google ScholarDigital Library
8. Jan de Wit, Paul Vogt, and Emiel Krahmer. 2023. The Design and Observed Effects of Robot-performed Manual Gestures: A Systematic Review. J. Hum.-Robot Interact. 12, 1, Article 1 (feb 2023), 62pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3549530Google ScholarDigital Library
9. L.M. Dunn and D.M. Dunn. 1997. Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test–III. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
10. Linda Faas. 2019. De jongen en de walvis. Lemniscaat.Google Scholar
11. Susan Goldin-Meadow and MarthaWagner Alibali. 2013. Gesture’s Role in Speaking, Learning, and Creating Language. Annual Review of Psychology 64, Volume 64, 2013 (2013), 257–283. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143802Google ScholarCross Ref
12. EllyA Konijn, Brechtje Jansen, Victoria MondacaBustos, VeerleLNF Hobbelink, and Daniel PreciadoVanegas. 2022. Social robots for (second) language learning in (migrant) primary school children. International Journal of Social Robotics (2022), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-021-00824-3Google ScholarCross Ref
13. EllyA Konijn, Matthijs Smakman, and Rianne Berghe. 2020. Use of robots in education. In The international encyclopedia of media psychology. Wiley, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119011071.iemp0318Google ScholarCross Ref
14. TerryK Koo and MaeY Li. 2016. A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine 15, 2 (2016), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012Google ScholarCross Ref
15. JacquelineM. KoryWestlund, Sooyeon Jeong, HaeW. Park, Samuel Ronfard, Aradhana Adhikari, PaulL. Harris, David DeSteno, and CynthiaL. Breazeal. 2017. Flat vs. Expressive Storytelling: Young Children’s Learning and Retention of a Social Robot’s Narrative. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 11 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00295Google ScholarCross Ref
16. Hanneke Leeuwestein, Marie Barking, Hande Sodacı, Ora Oudgenoeg-Paz, Josje Verhagen, Paul Vogt, Rian Aarts, Sybren Spit, Mirjam de Haas, Jan de Wit, and Paul Leseman. 2021. Teaching Turkish-Dutch kindergartners Dutch vocabulary with a social robot: Does the robot’s use of Turkish translations benefit children’s Dutch vocabulary learning?Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 37, 3 (2021), 603–620. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12510Google ScholarCross Ref
17. MikeE.U. Ligthart, MarkA. Neerincx, and KoenV. Hindriks. 2020. Design Patterns for an Interactive Storytelling Robot to Support Children’s Engagement and Agency. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Cambridge, United Kingdom) (HRI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 409–418. https://doi.org/10.1145/3319502.3374826Google ScholarDigital Library
18. HaeWon Park, Ishaan Grover, Samuel Spaulding, Louis Gomez, and Cynthia Breazeal. 2019. A Model-Free Affective Reinforcement Learning Approach to Personalization of an Autonomous Social Robot Companion for Early Literacy Education. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 33, 01 (Jul. 2019), 687–694. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.3301687Google ScholarDigital Library
19. Ming Sun, Iolanda Leite, JillFain Lehman, and Boyang Li. 2017. Collaborative Storytelling between Robot and Child: A Feasibility Study. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children (Stanford, California, USA) (IDC ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1145/3078072.3079714Google ScholarDigital Library
20. JerzyP. Szaflarski, VincentJ. Schmithorst, Mekibib Altaye, AnnaW. Byars, Jennifer Ret, Elena Plante, and ScottK. Holland. 2006. A longitudinal functional magnetic resonance imaging study of language development in children 5 to 11 years old. Annals of Neurology 59, 5 (2006), 796–807. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.20817Google ScholarCross Ref
21. Rianne vanden Berghe. 2022. Social robots in a translanguaging pedagogy: A review to identify opportunities for robot-assisted (language) learning. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 9 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2022.958624Google ScholarCross Ref
22. Rianne vanden Berghe, Josje Verhagen, Ora Oudgenoeg-Paz, Sanne vander Ven, and Paul Leseman. 2019. Social Robots for Language Learning: A Review. Review of Educational Research 89, 2 (2019), 259–295. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318821286Google ScholarCross Ref
23. Inspectie vanhet Onderwijs. 2019. PEIL.MONDELINGE TAALVAARDIGHEID EINDE BASISONDERWIJS. Chapter2. https://www.onderwijsinspectie.nl/binaries/onderwijsinspectie/documenten/rapporten/2019/03/28/peil-mtv-hoofdstuk-2-taalachtergrond/peil+mtv+taalachtergrond.pdfGoogle Scholar
24. Paul Vogt, Rianne vanden Berghe, Mirjam de Haas, Laura Hoffman, Junko Kanero, Ezgi Mamus, Jean-Marc Montanier, Cansu Oranç, Ora Oudgenoeg-Paz, DanielHernández García, Fotios Papadopoulos, Thorsten Schodde, Josje Verhagen, ChristopherD. Wallbridgell, Bram Willemsen, Jan de Wit, Tony Belpaeme, Tilbe Göksun, Stefan Kopp, Emiel Krahmer, AylinC. Küntay, Paul Leseman, and AmitKumar Pandey. 2019. Second Language Tutoring Using Social Robots: A Large-Scale Study. In 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). 497–505. https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2019.8673077Google ScholarCross Ref

Index Terms

1. Interactive Storytelling with Social Robots to Support Multilingual Children

   1. Applied computing

      1. Education

         1. Computer-assisted instruction

   2. Human-centered computing

      1. Human computer interaction (HCI)

         1. Interaction paradigms

            1. Collaborative interaction

               See Also

               What do you do if your interactive learning experiences are not engaging learners?

• The experience of interactive storytelling: comparing “fahrenheit” with “façade”

  ICEC'11: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Entertainment Computing

  At the intersection of multimedia, artificial intelligence, and gaming technology, new visions of future entertainment media arise that approximate the “Holodeck” ® idea of interactive storytelling. We report exploratory experiments on the user ...

  Read More

• Design Patterns for an Interactive Storytelling Robot to Support Children's Engagement and Agency

  HRI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

  In this paper we specify and validate three interaction design patterns for an interactive storytelling experience with an autonomous social robot. The patterns enable the child to make decisions about the story by talking with the robot, reenact parts ...

  Read More

• The Motivational Appeal of Interactive Storytelling: Towards a Dimensional Model of the User Experience

  ICIDS '09: Proceedings of the 2nd Joint International Conference on Interactive Digital Storytelling: Interactive Storytelling

  A conceptual account to the quality of the user experience that interactive storytelling intends to facilitate is introduced. Building on socialscientific research from `old' entertainment media, the experiential qualities of curiosity, suspense, ...

  Read More